2016年08月 46-4 從關係主義文化變遷觀點建構男性親密暴力者的分類架構

邱獻輝
國立中正大學犯罪防治學系暨研究所

 

男性親密暴力有其變異性,因此實用有效的分類是理解其心理機制的重要基礎。目前較受關注的國內外分類架構皆未考量華人關係主義及其變遷的影響性,且常植基於受暴女性觀點,以致未能周延反映台灣強制處遇男性親密暴力者的主觀經驗。因此本研究嘗試從華人關係主義文化變遷的適應觀點出發,以強制處遇男性親密暴力者的經驗敘說為主體,佐以司法文件作為校正素材,進行分類建構。為達此目的,本研究在方法學上遵循建構主義典範,邀請 24 名男性接受半結構深度訪談,其中 6 人為家暴專監的親密暴力收容人,18 人為某地方法院裁定社區親密暴力強制處遇之相對人,所得訪談文本以共識質性研究法進行分析。研究結果綜合出五個分類向度,包括華人父權認同與親密暴行、伴侶角色實踐的省思、從子女關注到伴侶關注、酒精使用、人格與臨床症狀;據此五個向度將受訪者分成四個類型,包括自我調整型、避罰傳統型、混亂再犯型、反擊型。本研究並針對研究結果與其意涵進行討論。

關鍵詞:文化變遷、家庭暴力、華人、類型學

 

關鍵字
文化變遷、家庭暴力、華人、類型學

參考書目
李良哲(2000):維繫婚姻關係重要因素的成人期差異研究。中華心理衛生學刊,13(3),61-
87。[Lee, L. J. (2000). A study of adulthood differences in elements of maintaining marital
relationships. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 13(3), 61-87.]
林明傑(2009):家庭暴力案件危險分級與快速評估之進階實務。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,5
(2),305-316。[Lin, M. C. (2009). Advanced practice on risk assessment and risk stratification for
domestic violence. Asian Journal of Domestic Violence and Sexual Offense, 5(2), 305-316.]
林明傑、沈勝昂(2004):婚姻暴力加害人分類之研究。中華心理衛生學刊,17(2),67-92。[Lin,
M. C., & Shen, S. A. (2004). The study of typology among intimate abusers. Formosa Journal of
Mental Health, 17(2), 67-92.]
邱獻輝、葉光輝(2012):從傳統華人貞節觀念探討男性殺妻,本土心理學研究,38,43-100。
[Chiou, H. H., & Yeh, K. H., (2012). Exploring wife-killing homicide from the perspective of
traditional Chinese fidelity. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 38, 43-100.]
邱獻輝、葉光輝(2013):失根的大樹:從文化觀點探究親密暴力殺人者的生命敘說。中華輔導與
諮商學報,37,89-124。[Chiou, H. H., & Yeh, K. H. (2013). The tree without root: Exploring the
life narratives of intimate homicide from cultural perspectives. Chinese Annual Report of Guidance
and Counseling, 37, 89-124.]
邱獻輝、葉光輝(2014):臉面在教唆殺妻歷程的心理意涵:華人臉面理論的應用。人文及社會
集刊,26(3),483-523。[Chiou, H. H., & Yeh, K. H. (2014). The psychological meaning of face
within the instigation of intimate partner femicide: Application of Chinese face theory. Journal of
Social Sciences and Philosophy, 26(3), 483-523.]
陳向明(2002):教師如何做質的研究。台北:洪葉文化。[Chen, X. M. (2002). How do teachers do
qualitative researches. Taipei, Taiwan: Hungyeh Publishing.]
陳秉華、李素芬、林美珣(2008):諮商中伴侶關係的自我協調歷程。本土心理學研究,29,117-
182。DOI: 10.6254/2008.29.117 [Chen, P. W., Lee, S. F., & Lin, M. H. (2009). An exploratory
study of self-coordinating process in couple relationship counseling. Indigenous Psychological
Research in Chinese Societies, 29, 117-182. doi: 10.6254/2008.29.117]
陳高凌(2001):義與面子在華人家庭暴力理的運作及其對治療之啟示。本土心理學研究,15,
3-111。DOI: 10.6254/2001.15.63 [Chan, K. L. (2001). Understanding of family violence through
the Chinese concepts of face and yi. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 15,
3-111. doi: 10.6254/2001.15.63]
費孝通(1947):鄉土中國。上海:觀察社。[Fei, H. T. (1947). Local China. Shanghai, China: Observation
Society.]
黃光國(2009):儒家關係主義:哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。台北:心理。[Hwang,  K.
K.  (2009).  Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations. Taipei, Taiwan:
Psychological Publishing.]
楊國樞(2004):華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究:社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研
究,22,11-80。[Yang, K. S. (2004). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the Chinese self from
the perspective of social and individual orientation. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese
Societies, 22, 11-80.]
楊國樞、余安邦、葉明華(1991):中國人的個人傳統性與現代性:概念與測量。載於楊國樞、黃
光國(主編),中國人的心理與行為(一九八九)(241-306 頁)。台北:桂冠。[Yang, K. S., Yu, A.
B., & Ye, M. H. (1991). The traditional and modern traits of Chinese: Concept and measurement. In
K. S. Yang & K. K. Hwang (Eds.), The psychology and behavior of chinese people (1989)(pp. 241-
306). Taipei, Taiwan: Kuei-Kuan Publishing. ]  
葉光輝(2004):現代華人家人的互動關係及其心理歷程。本土心理學研究,22,81-119。[Yeh, K.
H. (2004). Relational dynamics and psychological processes within the modern Taiwanese family.
Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 22, 81-119.]
葉光輝、黃宗堅、邱雅沂(2006):現代華人的家庭文化特徵:以台灣北部地區若干家庭的探討
為例。本土心理學研究,25,141-195。[Yeh, K. H., Huang, T. C., & Chiu, Y. Y. (2006). The
characteristics of modern Chinese family culture: A study of 24 families in northern Taiwan.
Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 25, 141-195.]
潘淑滿、楊榮宗、林津如(2012):巢起巢落∼女同志親密暴力、T 婆角色扮演與求助行為。台灣社
會研究季刊,87,45-102。[Pan, S. M., Yang, J. T., & Lin, C. J. (2012). In the beginning there is a
nest: Lesbian intimate partner abuse, space, butch and femme, and seeking help. Taiwan: A Radical
Quarterly In Social Studies, 87, 45-102.]
蕭英玲、利翠珊(2009):夫妻間的恩情與親密:簡效量表的發展。本土心理學研究,32,3-40。
DOI: 10.6254/2009.32.3 [Hsian, Y. L., & Li, T. S. (2009). Development and validation of a brief
version of Chinese marital affection scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies.
32, 3-40. doi: 10.6254/2009.32.3]
羅燦煐(2011):我國同居親密關係之暴力樣態、歷程及服務需求研究。內政部委託專案報告
(編號:PG10003-0754)。[Luo, T. Y. (2011). A study on the types, process, and service needs of
intimate violence among cohabitating partners in Taiwan. Sponsored by ministry of the interior
research grant (NO: PG10003-0754).]
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (4th ed.).
Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson, K. L. (2010). Conflict, power, and violence in families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72,
726-742. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00727.x
Archer, J. (1999). Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scale: A meta-analytic review.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(12), 1263-1289. doi: 10.1177/088626099014012003
Babcock, J. C., Canady, B., Graham, K. H., & Schart, L. (2007). The evolution of battering interventions:
From the dark ages into the scientific age. In J. Hamel & T. Nicholls (Eds.), Family therapy for
domestic violence: A practitioner’s guide to gender-inclusive research and treatment. (pp. 215-
244). New York, NY: Springer.
Calton, J. M., Cattaneo, L. B., & Gebhard, K. T. (2015). Barriers to help seeking for lesbian, gay,
bisexual, transgender, and queer survivors of intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,
1-16. doi: 10.1177/1524838015585318
Cavanaugh, M. M., & Gelles, R. J. (2005). The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies:
New directions for research, policy, and practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 155-
166. doi: 10.1177/0886260504268763
Chan, K. L. (2009). Protection of face and avoidance of responsibility: Chinese men’s account of violence
against women. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(1), 93-108. doi: 10.1080/02650530902723340
Chan, K. L. (2012). The role of Chinese face in the perpetration of dating partner violence. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, 27(4), 793-811. doi: 10.1177/0886260511423242
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y.
S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Chen,  P.  W.  (2009).  A  counseling  model  for  self-relation  coordination  for  Chinese  clients
with  interpersonal  conflicts.  The  Counseling  Psychologist,  37(7),  987-1009.  doi:
10.1177/0011000009339975
Corbin,  J.,  &  Strauss,  A.  (2008).  Basics  of  qualitative  research:  Techniques  and  procedures  for
developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781452230153
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York, NY: Free Press.
Dutton, D. G. (1995). A scale for measuring the propensity for abusiveness. Journal of Family Violence,
10(2), 203-221. doi: 10.1007/BF02110600
Dutton, D. G., & Corvo, K. (2007). The duluth model: A data-impervious paradigm and a failed strategy.
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(6), 658-667. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2007.03.002
Elisha, E., Idisis, Y., Timor, U., & Addad, M. (2010). Typology of intimate partner homicide personal,
interpersonal, and environmental characteristics of men who murdered their female intimate partner.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(4), 494-516. doi:
10.1177/0306624X09338379
Giifus, M. E., Traboid, N., O’Brien, P., & Fiecif-Henderson, A. (2010). Gender and intimate partner
violence: Evaluating the evidence. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(2), 245-263. doi: 10.5175/
JSWE.2010.200900019
Gondolf, E. W. (1988). Who are those guys? Toward a behavioral typology of batterers. Violence and
Victims, 3, 187-203.
Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2003). Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships:
The effect of sampling. Violence and Victims, 18(2), 181-196. doi: 10.1891/vivi.2003.18.2.181
Guba,  E.  G.,  &  Lincoln,  Y.  S.  (2005).  Paradigmatic  controversies,  contradictions,  and  emerging
confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd
ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hamberger, L. K., Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., & Tolin, D. F. (1996). A large sample empirical typology of
male spouse abusers and its relationship to dimensions of abuse. Violence and Victims, 11, 277-292.
Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual
qualitative  research:  An  update.  Journal  of  Counseling  Psychology,  52(2),  196-205.  doi:
10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative
research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517-572. doi: 10.1177/0011000097254001
Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on
methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1111/1467-
839X.00002
Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). A hypotheses on kinship and culture. In F. L. K. Hsu (Ed.), Kinship and culture (pp.
3-29). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1985). The self in cross-cultural perspective. In A. J. Marsella, G. Devos, & F. L. K. Hsu
(Eds.), Culture and self: Asian and western perspectives (pp. 24-55). New York, NY: Tavistock.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing
the Holtzworth-Munroe & Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 68(6), 1000-1019. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.1000
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2003). Do subtypes of
martially violent men continue to differ over time? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
71(4), 728-740. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.4.728
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batters: Three subtypes and the
differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476-497. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.476
Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4),
945-974. doi: 10.1086/228588
Jacobson, N., & Gottman, J. (1998). When men batter women. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and
situational couple violence. Lebanon, New Hampshire: Northeastern University Press.
Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Levant, R. E (1996,). The new psycholoigy of men. Professional psychology : research and practice.
27(3), 259-265.
Li, T. S., & Chen, F. M. (2002). Affection in marriage: A study of marital En-qing and intimacy in
Taiwan. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Society, 3(1), 37-59.
Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative
Inquiry, 1(3), 275-289. doi: 10.1177/107780049500100301
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (chapter 9, pp.289-1331). Beverly Hills, CA:
Sage.
Lu, L. (2008). The individual-oriented and social-oriented Chinese bicultural self: Testing the theory.
The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(3), 347-373. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.3.347-374
Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2006). Individual-oriented and socially oriented cultural conceptions of subjective
well-being: Conceptual analysis and scale development. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(1),
36-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00183.x
Mak, W. W. S., Chong, E. S. K., & Kwong, M. M. F. (2010). Prevalence of same-sex intimate partner
violence in Hong Kong. Public Health, 124, 149-152. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.02.002
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and
motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.98.2.224
Nazroo,  J.  (1999).  Uncovering  gender  difference  in  the  use  of  marital  violence:  The  effect  of
methodology. Sociology, 29(3), 475-494. doi: 10.1177/0038038595029003006
Nowinski, S. N., & Bowen, S. (2012). Partner violence against heterosexual and gay men: Prevalence
and correlates. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 36-52. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2011.09.005
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1996). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. Duluth,
Minnesota: Minnesota Program Development Inc.
Potter, H. (2008). Black women and intimate partner abuse. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Stults, C. B., Javdani, S., Greenbaum, C. A., Barton, S. C., Kapadia, F., & Halkitis, P. H. (2015).
Intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization among YMSM: The P18 cohort study.
Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(2), 152-158. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000104
Sun, K. (2008). Correctional counseling: A cognitive growth perspective. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and
Bartlett Publishers.
Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that
perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 997-1010. doi:
10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997
Voorhis, P. V., & Salisbury, E. J. (2014). The process of correctional counseling and treatment. In P.
Van Voorhis, M. Braswell, & D. Lester (Eds.), Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (8th ed.,  
pp. 3-23). Waltham, MA: Anderson.
Wu, B. (2009). Intimate homicide between Asians and non-Asians: The impact of community context.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(7), 1148-1164. doi: 10.1177/0886260508322191
Yang, K. S. (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal
modernization. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 479-498). Hong
Kong, China: Oxford University Press.
Zehr, H. (2014). The little book of restorative justice: Revised and updated. New York, NY: Good
Books.

全文下載
全文下載