2002年3月 11-4以家庭系統觀進行家庭系統測量之研究 一以家庭系統分化為例

孫頌賢 修慧蘭
國立政治大學教育研究所碩士 國立政治大學心理系副教授
 
本研究乃依家庭系統觀,以「情感共振」與「干涉侵權」之家庭系統分化架構,探討「多元系統一多元方法J 進行家庭測量時的原則與問題。以在大學就讀學生之「起飛期家庭」為單位(包括家中的學生、父、母等三人),正式研究結果共蒐集到77 個家庭的完整資料。主要結果包括:第一,研究發現成員問同時具備「一致性」與「不一致性」的現象,此種「同中有異」、「異中有同」的特性,反映出系統測量時的獨特之處﹔第二,驗證家庭系統中的不等加性、家庭整體性並不能成功的被驗證’但驗證次系統的存在、以及驗證次系統之間具有關連性等系統理論﹔第三,在測量對象上,結果發現不同成員間的差異的確存在,故進行家庭系統測量之測量單位應以「整個家庭」為單位,故測量對象應色括父、母、子三者甚至更多,所獲得的資料亦更接近系統性也更加豐富﹔第四,不同成員對於不同次系統知覺之分化內涵不同,故必須將不同次系統分開測量﹔第五,在家庭系統分析方法上,不同成員間觀點之差異性是確實存在的,而不適合使用「平均數法」與「差異數法」處理系統資料。最後討論系統測量在研究上與實務上的啟發與建議。

關鍵字
多元系統一多元方法、家庭分化、家庭系統觀、家庭測量、起飛期家庭

參考書目
王大維(民85 ) 。家庭系統分化與大學生的心理社會發展之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文。
利翠珊( 民88 ) 。家庭心理學的系統觀點與研究。應用心理研究,2, 21-40。
邱秀燕(民89 ) 。青少年家庭系統分化、心理分離一個體化、自我發展及情緒適應之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
修慧蘭(民87 )。從家庭發展週期談學生行為問題。學生輔導,59, 62-71 。
莊耀嘉(民89 )。家庭中人際互動結構與運作模式。本土心理學研究,12, 3-46 。
陳文卿(民87 )。青少年自殺意念與家庭功能、無望感之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文。
陳惠雯(民89 )。婚姻衝突、家庭界限與青少年子女適應之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
黃宗堅(民88 )。家庭系統的測量與應用。應用心理研究,2, 83-109 。
楊秀宜( 民88 ) 。犯罪青少年的家庭分化系統與其人格特質之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
楊金滿(民84 ) 。家庭互動關係與青少年自我統合發展之研究。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
賈紅鶯(民80 ) 。父母自我分化、子女自我分化與子女適應水準之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
趙淑珠、劉安真等譯(民88 ) 。家族治療實務一不同模式中重要元素的整合。台北:五南。
劉惠琴(民89 )。母女關係的社會建構。應用心理研究,6,97-130 。
羅國英( 民84 )。家庭研究中的測量問題一文獻探討。東吳社會工作學報,1,37-90 。
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T.. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 213-232.
Bartle-Haring, S., & Gavazzi, S. M. (1996). Multiple views on family data: The sample case of adolescence, maternal and paternal perspectives on family differentiation levels. Family Process, 35(4), 457-472.
Bartle-Haring, S., Kenny, D. A., & Gavazzi, S. M. (1999). Multiple perspectives on family differentiation: Analyses by multitrait multimethod matrix and triadic social relations models. Journal Marriage and the Family, 61, 491-503.
Bray, J. H. (1995). Family assessment: Current issues in evaluating families. Family Relations, 44, 469-4 77.
Carr, A. ( 1995). Family therapy and clinical psychology. Journal of Fam砂Therapy, 17; 435-444.
Cole D. A., & Jordan, A. E. (1989). Assessment of cohesion and adaptability in component family dyads: A question of convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(4), 456-463.
Cole D. A., & McPherson, A. E. (1993). Relation of family subsystems to adolescent
depression: Implementing a new family assessment strategy. Journal of Family Psychology, 7( 1 ), 119-13 3.
Cook, T. D. (1985). Postpositivist critical multiplism. In R. L. Shotland & M. M. Mark(Eds.). Social Science and Social Policy. (pp.21.:.62). Beverly Hill: SAGE.
Corey, G. (1996). Theoηy and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (51h ed.). CA: Brooks/Cole.
Cottone, R. R. (1989). Defining the psychomedical and systemic paradigms in marital and family therapy. Journal ofM arital and Family, Therapy, 15(3), 225-235.
Cromwell, R. E., & Peterson, G. W. (1983). Multisystem-multimethod family assessment in clinical contexts. Family Process, 22, 147-163.
Floyd, F. J., Weinand, J. W., & Cimmarusti, R. A. (1989). Clinical family assessment: Applying structured measurement procedures in treatment settings. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15(3), 271-288.
Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family therapy: Overview (4th ed.}. CA: Brooks/Cole.
Green, R. G., & Vosler, N. R. (1992). Issues in the assessment of family practice: An empirical study. Journal of Social Service Research, 15(314 ), 1-19.
Green, R., & Werner, P. D. (1996). Intrusiveness and closeness-caregiving: Rethinking the concept of family “Enmeshment’,.Family Process, 35(2), 115-136.
Grotevant, H . D., & Carlson, C. I. (1989). Family assessment: A Guide to methods and measures: Family assessment: Pasι present, and future. NY: The Guilford Press.
JOreskong, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User Rereference guide. Chicago: SSI.
Kaslow, N. J., & Celano, M. P. (1995). The family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & S. B. Messer (Eds.). Essential psychotherapies: Theoηy and practice (pp.343-402). New York: Guilford Press.
Legg, C. (1997). Science and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 19, 401-415.
Lewinsohn, M. A., & Werner, P. D. (1997). Factors in Chinese marital process: Relationship to Marital adjustment. Family Process, 36(1), 43-61.
Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1991). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (2nd ed). MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Pinsof, W. M. (1992). Toward a scientific paradigm for family psychology: The integrative process systems perspective. Journal of Family, Psychology, 5(314), 432-447.
Piotrowski, C. P. (1999). Use of tests and measures in marital and family research. Psychological Reports, 84, 1251-1252.
Sidani, S., & Jones, E. (1995). Use of the multitrait multimethod(MTMM) to analyze family relational data. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 17(5), 556-570.
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. NY: Norton.
Szapocznik, J., Kurtines, W., Hervis, 0., Rio, A. T., Faraci, A. M., & Mitrani, V. B.( 1991 ). Assessing change in family functioning as a result of treatment: The structural family systems rating scale (SFSR). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17(3), 295-310.
Tein, J., Rossa, M. W., & Michaels, M. (1994). Agreement between parent and child reports on parental behaviors. Journal of Marriage and the Family , 56, 341-355.
Thomas, V. (1995). The clinical report: Integrating family assessment instruments into family counseling practice. Family Journal, 3(4), 284-298.
Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B. F., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Handbook off family, measurement techniques. London: SAGE.
Wilkinson, I. ( 1987). Family assessment: A review. Journal of Family Therapy, 9, 367-380.
Wilkinson, I., Barn, M. B., Del , L., & Pirie, V. (1988). Family assessment: Developing a formal assessment system in clinical practice. Journal of Family Tharapy , 17-32.
Wilkinson I. M., & Stratton, P. (1991). The reliability and validity of a system for family assessment. Journal of Family Therapy, 13, 73-94.
Wood, B. (1985). Proximity and hierarchy: orthogonal dimensions of family interconnectedness. Family Process, 24, 487-507.

全文下載
全文下載