黃世琤教授 Professor Shih-Tseng Tina Huang

本研究旨在探討大學生運用物品調適悲傷的經驗，瞭解悲傷療癒物品對大學生悲傷調適的效果及意義。研究者以深度、半結構式訪談蒐集十位受訪者的主觀陳述資訊，採質性研究中的現象學取向，依研究目的得出結果，分為三大主題及十個次主題。主題一：與悲傷療癒物品的互動特色：（1）在私人空間和時間使用；（2）與悲傷療癒物品「擬人化」的互動，想像物和人一樣有情感；（3）維持數年的使用關係；（4）他人認同與否不會影響個人對物的觀感。主題二：悲傷療癒物品的療癒效果：（1）因接觸物引發的五官感受能穩定心情，帶來正向的情緒；（2）悲傷療癒效果非「人類」能取代；（3）悲傷隨時間消褪，未受物牽制。主題三：悲傷療癒物品對大學生悲傷調適的意義：（1）珍重使用。實質材料可替換，但象徵意義他物無法取代；（2）能療癒己身悲傷，但也會引發悲傷；（3）從物學到人生的功課有助於未來的悲傷療癒。依據上述發現，本文結論建議助人專業工作者進行悲傷諮商時，可以用正向的態度看待人與物品的關係，探索這些具有連繫意義的物品的存在，協助悲傷者覺
察它們在悲傷療癒過程中發揮的功用與傳達出來的生命意義價值，進而發展出面對人生困境獨有的因應觀和復原力。

參考書目
朱光潛（2003）：文藝心理學。台北：漢湘文化。[Zhu, G. Q. (2003). Literature and art psychology.
Taipei, Taiwan: Han Xiang Publishers.]
江學瀅（2011）：成年人藝術創作依戀行為之研究。國立臺灣師範大學美術學系博士論文，未出版，
台北。[Chiang, S. Y. (2011). The study of art-tachment in adults. Unpublished doctoral disseration.
National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.]
吳俊儒（2009）：成年人之療傷系玩具消費：商品意義建構、消費體驗與價值創造。世新大學公共
關係暨廣告所碩士論文，未出版，台北。[Wu. J. R. (2009). Adult as a healing toy consumer:
construction of product meaning, consumption experience, and value creation. Unpublished
master’s thesis. Shih Hsin University, Taipei, Taiwan.]
杞琇婷（2008）：療癒系商品影響心情轉換之要因與成效。國立成功大學工業設計學系碩士論文，未
出版，台南。[Chi, H. T. (2008). The causes and effectiveness of healing products towards human's
emotional transformation. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Cheng Kung University, Tainan,
Taiwan.]
李維倫譯（2004）：現象學十四講。台北：心靈工坊。Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to
Phenomenology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
李維倫、賴憶嫺（2009）：現象學方法論：存在行動的投入。中華輔導與諮商學報，25，275-321。
[Lee, W. L., & Lai, Y. H. (2009). Phenomenological methodology as an existential move. Chinese
Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 25, 275-321.]
林秀慧、林明雄譯（2001）：客體關係治療：關係的運用。台北：心理出版社。Sheldon, C. (1988).
Object relations therapy: Using the relationship. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
洪漢鼎（2008）：重新回到現象學的原點：現象學十四講。台北：世新大學。[Hong, H. D. (2008).
Back to the origin of phenomenology: Forteen lectures of phenomenology. Taipei, Taiwan: Shih
Hsin University.]
高淑清（2008）：質性研究的 18 堂課：揚帆再訪之旅。高雄：麗文文化。[Gao, S. Q. (2008).
Eighteen lessons of qualitative research: Jorney of sailing and revisiting. Kaohsiung, Tawian:
Liwen Publishing Group.]
翁鈴雅（2008）：偶像劇的療癒系功能：本土偶像劇的閱聽人研究。世新大學公共關係暨廣告所碩士
論文，未出版，台北。[Weng, L. Y. (2008). The healing style of trendy drama: Audience research
of local trendy drama. Unpublished master’s thesis. Shih Hsin University, Taipei, Taiwan.]
徐錦堯（1993）：中華文化與綠色思想。取自 http://archive.hsscol.org.hk/Archive/periodical/spirit/
S017f.htm [Xu, J. Y. (1993). Chinese culture and green thinking. Retrieved from http://archive.
hsscol.org.hk/Archive/periodical/spirit/S017f.htm]
張汝倫（1997）：現象學方法的多重含義。哲學雜誌，20，90-115。[Chang, J. L. (1997). Multiple
meanings of phenomenology. Philosophy, 20, 90-115.]
畢恆達（1996）：物情物語。台北：張老師文化。[Bi, H. D. (1996). Passionate stories of objects.
Taipei, Taiwan: Living Psychology Publishiers.]
陳登義譯（2006）：客體關係入門—基本理論與應用。台北：五南出版社。Gomez, L. (1997). An
introduction to object relations. London, England: Free Association Books.
廣梅芳、丁凡、楊淑智譯（2002）：打開戀物情結。台北：張老師文化。[Hammerslough, J. (2001).
Dematerializing: Taming the power of possessions. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.]
潘淑滿（2003）：質性研究：理論與應用。台北：心理出版社。[Pan, S. M. (2003). Qualitative
reseach: Theories and applications. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological Publishing.]
聶慧文（2005）：大學生經歷失落事件的悲傷迷思、因應行為與至今復原程度之關聯性研究，國立交
通大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹。[Nieh, H. W. (2005). The correlative study of grief
misconception, coping behaviors and recovery degree of undergraduate students with losses in
their lives. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.]
藍意茹（2006）：「癒す」玩具之設計探究。國立台灣藝術大學造形藝術研究所碩士論文，未出版，
台北。[Lan, Y. J. (2006). Research on visual communication of healing toys. Unpublished master’s
thesis. National Taiwan University of Arts, Taipei, Taiwan.]
饒婉平（2006）：療癒系商品之消費者體驗研究。銘傳大學設計管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台
北。[Jao, W. P. (2006). Exploring the consumer experience of healing style products. Unpublished
master’s thesis. Ming Chuan University, Taipei, Taiwan.]
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Field, N. P., Nichols, C., Holen, A., & Horowitz, M. J. (1999). The relation of continuing attachment to
adjustment in conjugal bereavement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 212-
218. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.212
Gillies, J., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2006). Loss, grief, and the search for significance: Toward a model of
meaning reconstruction in bereavement. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19(1), 31–65. doi:
10.1080/10720530500311182
Humphrey, K. M. (2009). Counseling strategies for loss and grief. Alexandria, VA: American
Counseling Association.
Litt, C. J. (1986). Theories of transitional object attachment: An overview. International Journal of
Behavioral Development, 9, 383-399. doi: 10.1177/016502548600900308
McCullough, C. (2009). A child’s use of transitional objects in art therapy to cope with
divorce. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 26(1), 19-25. doi:
10.1080/07421656.2009.10129306
Moustakas C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology and applications. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage Publications.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Phyllis (2012)：零雜物：讓生活輕盈，讓心更自由。台北：方智。[Phyllis (2012). Zero mess. Taipei,
Taiwan: Eastern Horizons Corporation.]
Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2005). Attachment in coping with bereavement: A theoretical
integration. Review of General Psychology, 9(1), 48-66. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.1.48
Volkan, V. D. (1972). The linking objects of pathological mourners. Archives of General Psychiatry, 27,
215-221. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750260061009
Worden, J. W. (2009). Grief counseling and grief therapy, fourth edition: A handbook for the mental
health practitioner. New York, NY: Springer.