王文秀、施香如、沙大荒譯(1999)。臨床督導工作的理論與實務。台北:張老師。Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision - A systems approach.
林葦芸譯(2006)。權力:基進觀點。台北:商週。Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view, (2nd ed.).施香如(2000)。督導者與諮商員在督導過程中的知覺差異研究。中國輔導學報，8，1-20。
徐西森、廖鳳池(2002 年 11 月)。諮商督導歷程、功能與任務之分析研究—以系統取向督導模式(SAS)為架構。諮商與心理治療實習和專業監督學術研討會論文集，高雄。
孫非譯(1988)。社會生活中的交換與權力。台北:桂冠。Blau, P. M. (1964).Exchange & power in social life.
柯勝文譯(2000)。權力與社會—社會科學導論。台北:桂冠。Dye, T. (2000). Power & society (7th ed.).
高湘澤、高泉余譯(1994)。權力—它的形式、基礎與作用。台北:桂冠。Wrong, D. (1988). Power: Its forms, bases and uses.
連廷嘉、徐西森(2003)。諮商督導者與實習諮商員督導經驗之分析。應用心理研究，18，89-111。
陳金燕(2003)。自我覺察在諮商專業中之意涵:兼論自我覺察督導模式。應用心理研究，18，29-87。
許韶玲(2001)。受督導者於督導過程中的焦慮來源及對焦慮的因應策略之探討。諮商與輔導，192，6-10。
許韶玲(2003)。督導者知覺受督者影響督導過程之因素。應用心理研究，18，113-144。 黃光國(1988)。
中國人的權力遊戲。台北:巨流。
黃光國(1995)。知識與行動。台北:心理。
黃靚琦(2001)。督導者權力濫用與社會工作者因應行為之相關研究。靜宜大學青少年兒童福利學系碩士論文，未出版，台中。
楊明磊(2003)。督導制度的脈絡意義。應用心理研究，19，6-13。
靳建國譯(1989)。論權力。台北:遠流。Russell, B. (1938). Power.
蔡曉雯(2003)。年輕國會助理的權力覺察與行動策略研究。彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文，未出版，彰化。
蔡麟筆譯(1990)。權力政治與組織。台北:巨流。Kakabadse, A., & Parker, C. (1990). Power, politics, and organizations.
Bernard, M. J. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Borders, L. D., & Brown, L. L. (2005). The new handbook of counseling supervision. New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
Breaux, D. N. T. (2004). Development and psychometric utility of the revised supervision relationship survey. Unpublished dissertation, Mississippi State University, Missis-sippi.
Copeland, S. (2005). Counseling supervision in organizations: Professional and ethical dilemmas explored. London: Routledge.
Ellis, M. V., & Douce, L. A. (1994). Group supervision of novice clinical supervisors: Eight recurring issues. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72(5), 520-525.
Forsyth, D. R. (1998). Power. In D. R. Forsyth (Ed.), Group dynamics (3rd ed.) (pp. 207- 234). CA: Brooks/Cole, Wadsworth.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish – The birth of the prison. (Alan Sheridan, Trans.). NY: Penguin Books.
Garrett, T. (1997). Trainer-trainee bullying. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 7(3), 227-232.
Holloway, E. L., Freund, R. D., Gardner, S. L., Nelson, M. L., & Walker, B. R. (1989). Relation of power and involvement to theoretical orientation in supervision: An analysis of discourse. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(1), 88-102.
Holloway, E., & Wolleat, P. (1994). Supervision: The pragmatics of empowerment. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 5(1), 23-43.
Jacobs, C. (1991). Violations of the supervisory relationship: An ethical and educational blind spot. Social Work, 36(2), 130-135.
Kottler, J. A.(1991). Confronting our own hypocrisy: Being a model for our students and clients. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70(4), 475-476.
Markoczy, E. (2004). Parallel process and supervisees' openness in psychotherapy super- vision: A qualitative analysis. Unpublished dissertation, California Institute of Integral Studies, Califorma.
Murphy, M. J., & Wright, D. W. (2005). Supervisees’ perspectives of power use in supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(3), 283-295.
Porter, N., & Vasquez, M. (1997). Covision: Feminist supervision, process, and collaboration. In J. Worell (Ed.), Shaping the future of feminist psychology: Education, re- search, and practice (pp. 155-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Smoot, T. Y. (2001). Analysis of the power dynamics within consultation supervisory dyads over time. Unpublished dissertation, The University of Utah, Utah.
Sumerel, M. B. (1994). Parallel Process in Supervision (Report No. EDO-CG-94-15).Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED372347)