2004年3月 15-2 觀點取替故事岡理心量表的發展
本研究的目的在編製一份適合國內成人及大學生的觀點取替故事同理心量表,以提供研究與輔導應用。全量表含有認知性觀點取替同理心、情感性觀點取替同理心、表達性觀點取替同理心三個分量表,共16題,施測時間大約10-15分鐘。本研究以台灣地區2155位成年人及大學生為樣本進行信、效度考驗,結果顯示:
1. 在信度上,認知性觀點取替同理心、情感性觀點取替同理心、表達性觀點取替同理心三個分量表以及全量表之Cronbachα 係數分別為.67, .73, .70及. 87,間隔四遇之重測信度為.83 ,顯示此量表的內部一致性信度尚可。
2 . 在效度上,以驗證性因素分析檢驗其概念建構,顯現量表的建構效度良好。
關鍵字 參考書目 吳裕益( 民92 )。線性結構公式模式基本概念及模式適合度之評鑑。未出版。 Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1981). The empathy cycle: Refinement of a nuclear concept. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(2), 91-100. Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 751-758. Benack, S. (1984). Postformal epistemologies and the growth of empathy. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development, (pp.340-356). NY: Praeger. Berndt, T. J., & Perry, T. B. ( 1990). Distinctive features and effects of early adolescent friendships. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gulotta (Eds.), From childhood to adolescence: A transitional period. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Buhrmester, D. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Development, 61, 1101-1111. Carey, C. T., Fox, E., & Spraggins, E. F. (1988). Replication of structure findings regarding the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21, 102-106. Carkhuff, R. R. ( 1969). Helping and human relations. Vol. 1 & Vol. 2. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Coverdale, C. (1991). Two development lines in self psychology: Selfobject empathy and interpretation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147(5), 120-124. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(4), 1-17. |