2001年9月 10-3國中與高中學生家庭環境、學習投入狀況與自我調節學習及成就之研究
本研究之主要目的在於探討影響圈中與高中學生學業成就之背景因素、家庭環境、學習投入狀況與自我調節學習等重要變項的作用與關聯。具體目的在於考驗不同背景變項在中學生學習歷程上的差異、背景變項與歷程變項之預測作用、以及自評等第對學習結果的影響。
本研究的受試者係取自北、中、南、東12 所國中與高中的學生共531人,其中男生218 人,女生313 人。另外,本研究並有相對的家長受試者461人,以及班級導師受試者14 人。受試者經施以自編的「背景資料調查表」、「家庭環境調查表(學生自評)」、「家庭環境調查表(家長評定)」、「學習動機量表」、「學習投入量表(學生自評)」、「學習投入量表(家長評定)」、「自我調節學習量表(學生自評)」、「自我調節學習量表(教師評定)」’以及「學業成績調查表」等。所得資料經以變異數分析法、t 考驗與多元迴歸分析等加以考驗,結果獲致下列重要的發現:
一、高社經地位之受試者其自評之家庭環境得分顯著的高於低社經地位受試者﹔高社經地位家長所評定的家庭環境得分也顯著的優於相對組別。
二、親子間對學習投入之看法差異,因不同學習階段而有顯著不同,圈中階段親子間差異更大。
三、自評家庭環境較佳之受試者其學習動機、自評學習投入與父母評定學習投入得分均較高。
四、自評家庭環境較高組別之受試者其自我調節學習得分較高﹔學習動機與學習投入高分組之自我調節學習得分亦顯著的高於低分組。
五、經由多元迴歸發現,家庭環境在五個預測變項中,對學習動機依變項最具顯著預測效果,家庭環境與學習動機變項又對學生的學習投入最具顯著預測作用。
六、經由多元迴歸分析發現,在各背景變項與歷程變項中,以學習階段、自評家庭環境、學習動機、家長評定學習投入、學生自評學習投入等對自我調節學習具顯著預測作用。
本研究最後根據研究發現,對中學生之父母、教師、學生,以及學校輔導人員提供各項增進學生有效學習及提高學業成就的建議,最後,本研究亦對未來相關研究提供各種建議。
關鍵字 參考書目 法務部犯罪研究中心(民87 )。犯罪狀況及分析。台北:法務部。
黃德祥、魏麗敏( 民87 ) 。學習輔導的現況與展望。載於中國輔導學會主編,輔導學大趨勢( 165-188 頁),台北:心理出版社
魏麗敏( 民81) 。家庭環境量表的編製。測驗與輔導,帥, 2022-2024 。
魏麗敏( 民的)。影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文( 未出版)。
魏麗敏( 民88 )。國民中小學學生家庭因素、學習歷程與成就之分析研究。台北:五南。
魏麗敏( 民89 )。成就動機量表的編製及應用。測驗與輔導,158,3309-3312 。
Bandura, A. ( 1996). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Eductational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
Barber, R. J., & Patin, D. (1997). Parent involvement: A two-way street. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.EJ543334)
Bernstein, D. A. , Roy, E. J., Srull, T. K., & Wickens, C. D. (1988). Psychology. Boston: Hohgton Mifflin Co.
Bradley, R.H., Caldwell, B. M., & Rocks, S. L. (1988). Home environment and practices and school performance: A ten-year follow-up and examination of three models of environmental action. Child Development, 59, 852-867.
Como, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, αnd practice (pp. 111-141). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Dornbusch et al. ( 1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent performance. Child Development, 58, 1244-1257.
Ginsburg, G. S., & Bronstein, P. (1993). Family factors related to children's intrinsic/extrinsic motivational orientation and academic performance. Child Development, 64, 1461-1474.
Grolnick, W. S., Benjet, C., Kurowski, C. 0., & Apostoleris. N. H. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children's schooling. Journal of Educational Pshchology, 89, 538-548.
Little, P. (1998) . Early childhood digest: Family, involvement in early childhood programs-How 的choose the right program for your child. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED419612).
McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Moles, O. C.( 1997). Reaching all familes: The federal initiative in family-school partnerships. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED413072). Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1997). Families get involved! Learning partners. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED411989) Peterson, M. E. H. (1997). Low-SES Literacy Backgrounds: Effects on Formal Schooling. New York: Carnegie Corp. Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1992). A structural model of high school mathematics outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 150-157.
Schunk, D. H. (1996). Self-evaluation and self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, New York. (October, New York).
Turner, J. C., Thorpe, P. K., & Meyer, D. K. (1998). Students' reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 758-771.
Verna, M.A., Campbell, J. R., Beasley, M. (1997). Family processes, SES and family, structure differentially affect academic self-concepts and αchievement of gifted high school students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED410727)
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. ( 1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, VOl. 1: The fundamentals of defectology (R. Rieber & A. Carton, Eds., J. Knox & C. Stevens, Trans.) New York: Plenum.
Wigfield, A(1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologisι 32, 59-68.
Winne, R H. (1997). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologisι 30, 173-188.
Zimmerman, B. J. ( 1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key Subprocesses Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 07-313.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995a). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30, 217-221.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995b ). Self-monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 13-27.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Eductional Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In D. H. Schunk & J. I. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 185-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
|