Keywords
counseling supervisory relationship、process research、significant events、dyad research

Reference
施香如(2000)。督導者與諮商員在督導過程中的知覺差異研究。中華輔導學報，8，1-20。
翁令珍(2006，10 月)。諮商督導重要事件中督導者介入與受督導者知覺之分析研究:區辨模式 為架構。論文發表於中國輔導學會舉辦之 2006 年中國輔導學會年會暨國際學術研討會， 台北。
翁令珍、廖鳳池(2005)。諮商督導歷程中人際行為與受督導者知覺之分析研究。教育心理學報，37(2)，99-122。
張淑芬、廖鳳池(2007a)。諮商督導結盟歷程之初探研究:以一對督導為例。輔導與諮商學報，29(1)，67-86。
張淑芬、廖鳳池(2007b，10 月)。諮商督導中的權力與投入:系統取向督導模式(SAS)觀點。 論文發表於中國輔導學會舉辦之 2007 年中國輔導學會年會暨學術研討會，彰化。
張淑芬、廖鳳池(2007c，12 月)。初期諮商督導關係的共識與歧見:配對研究的發現。論文發 表於中興大學舉辦之教師專業發展研討會，台中。
許雅惠(2006)。督導者的回饋介入對實習諮商師的衝擊及諮商行為影響之分析研究:以一對諮 商督導為例。國立高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所博士論文，未出版，高雄。
許雅惠、廖鳳池(2005)。不同階段個別諮商督導歷程中督導議題與督導策略之分析研究。輔導 與諮商學報，27(1)，65-82。
許韶玲(1999)。受督導者督導前準備訓練方案的擬定及其實施對諮商督導過程影響之研究。國 立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文，未出版，彰化。
許韶玲(2004)。受督導者於督導過程中的隱而未說現象之研究。教育心理學報，36(2)，109-125。 
許韶玲(2005)。諮商新手在督導過程隱藏未揭露的訊息。輔導季刊，41(3)，31-38。 
鄭如安、廖鳳池(2005)。督導中重要事件內涵之分析研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所諮商輔導學報:高師輔導所刊，12，35-70。
Bernard, J. M. (1997). The Discrimination model. In C. E. Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 310-327). New York: John Wiley & Sons. 
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(1), 35-42.
Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(3), 322-329.
Elliott, R. (1984). A discovery-oriented approach to significant change events in psychotherapy: Interpersonal process recall and comprehensive process analysis. In L. N. Rice & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Patterns of change (pp. 249-286). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Elliott, R., & Shapiro, D. A. (1992). Client and therapist as analysts of significant events. In S. G. Toukmanian & D. L. Rennie (Eds.), Psychotherapy process research (pp. 163-186). London: Sage.
Gazzola, N., & Theriault, A. (2007). Super-(and not-so-super-)vision of counselors-in-training: Supervisee perspectives on broadening and narrowing processes. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 35(2), 189-204.
Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Change process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 4-9.
Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (2000). Supervision in the helping professions: An individual, group and organizational approach (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Heru, A. M., Strong, D. R., Price, M., & Recupero, P. R. (2004). Boundaries in psychotherapy supervision. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 58(1), 76-89.
Hill, C. E., & Corbett, M. M. (1993). A perspective on the history of process and outcome research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(1), 3-24.
Holloway, E. L. (1994). Overseeing the overseer: Contextualizing training in supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 526-530.
Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A Systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 
Kaiser, T. L. (1992). The supervisory relationship: A study of the relationship between supervisor and supervisee in the clinical supervision of marriage and family therapists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School of the University of Minnesota, Minnesota.
Kennard, B. D., Stewart, S. M., & Gluck, M. R. (1987). The supervisory relationship: Variables contributing to positive verses negative experiences. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18(2), 172-175.
Ladany, N., Constantine, M. G., Miller, K., Erickson, C. D., & Muse-Burke, J. L. (2000). Supervisor countertransference: A qualitative investigation into its identification and description. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 102-115.
Ladany, N., & Lehrman-Waterman, D. E. (1999). The content and frequency of supervisor self-disclosures and their relationship to supervisor style and the supervisory working alliance.Counselor Education and Supervision, 38, 143-160.
Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Melincoff, D. S. (2001). Supervisory style: Its relation to the supervisory working alliance and supervisor self-disclosure. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40, 263-275.
Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., & Delworth, U. (1982). Supervision: A conceptual model. The Counseling Psychologist, 10(1), 3-42.
Martin, J. S., Goodyear, R. K., & Newton F. B. (1987). Clinical supervision: An intense case study.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18(3), 225-235.
McNeill, B. W., & Worthen, V. (1989). The parallel process in psychotherapy supervision. Professional Psychotherapy: Research and Practice, 20(5), 329-333.
Nelson, M. L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: Thetrainee’s perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 384-395.
Nigam, T., Cameron, P. M., & Leverette, J. S. (1997). Impasses in the supervisory process: A resident’sperspective. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51(2), 252-272.
Olk, M. E., & Friedlander, M. L. (1992). Trainees’ experiences of role conflict and role ambiguity insupervisory relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(3), 389-397.
Patton, M. J., & Kivlighan, D. M., Jr. (1997). Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 108-115.
Ramos-Sánchez, L., Esnil, E., Goodwin, A., Riggs, S., Touster, L. O., Wright, L. K., Ratanasiripong, P., & Rodolfa, E. (2002). Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision satisfaction and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(2), 197-202.
Richman, J. B. (1991). Significant events in supervision (doctoral dissertation). Available from Dissertation Abstracts Internation. (UMI No. 9129616)
Stoltenberg, C. (1981). Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counselor-complexity model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(1), 59-65.
Stoltenberg, C. D., & Delworth, U. (1987). Supervising counselors and therapists: A developmental perspective. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Stoltenberg, C. D., & Mcneill, B. W. (1997). Clinical supervision from a developmental perspective: Research and practice. In C. E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 184-202). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Studer, J. R. (2005). Supervising school counselors-in-training: A guide for field supervisors.Professional School Counseling, 8(4), 353-360.
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1982). The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 889-900.
Webb, A., & Wheeler, S. (1998). How honest do counsellors dare to be in the supervisory relationship? An exploratory study. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 26(4), 509-524.
White, V. E., & Queener, J. (2003). Supervisor and supervisee attachments and social provisions related to the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 42, 203-218.

Download