The purposes of this study were to: (1) establish the Hill verbal interactional basic structure; (2) investigate the content and work style of verbal interactional behaviors in the group counseling process; (3) establish the basic criteria to evaluate group counseling; (4) examine the main factor and procedure that might effect the outcome of group counseling. The results were as indicated follows: 

A.Qualitative research 

1. Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM) could be used to record and classify the verbal interactional behaviors in the group counseling process. 

2. The degree of group structure would effect the speed of group interactional content style and work style, but the main factor was leadership. 

3. The minimum behaviors of content style used in group process were confrontation and assertion; the minimum and maximum behaviors of work style used in group process were topic center and member center respectively. 

B.Quantitative research 

1. All group members, structure group members and low structure group members indicated linear trend on the scores of self-evaluation and personal trait on the three times assessment of group process. 

2. The scores of HIM., self-evaluation and personal traits indicated partly no significant difference among sex, structure and assessment factors. 

 3. Comparing with the control groups, the counseling groups indicated no significant difference on the scores of Tennessee Self Concept Scale.

4. Comparing with the low structure groups, the structure groups indicated no significant difference on the score of Tennessee Self Concept Scale.

5. The input variables could partly predict interactional variables.

6. The input variables and interactional variables could partly predict output variable.

Keywords
Hill Interaction Matrix, content style, work style, self-evaluation, personal traits

Reference

方紫薇(民79):團體評估與團體研究(一)。諮商與輔導，60期，25-30。 

方紫薇(民80):團體評估與團體研究(二)。諮商與輔導，61期，27-32。

沈湘縈(民81a):諮商歷程之認知研究摘述: J. Martin認知中介典範之介紹。測驗與輔導，111期，2226- 2231 。 

吳英璋、李文瑄、郭照美、康淑美、陳珠璋(民70):門診精神分裂病患團體治療的互動過程分析。中華民國神經精神醫學會會刊，7卷，2期，12 。

吳英璋(民80):諮商過程中的過程分析。學生輔導通訊，15期，9-15 。 

 許秀惠(民82):諮商歷程中諮商員意圖與口語反應之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。 

陳若璋、李瑞玲(民76):團體諮商與治療研究的回顧評論。中華心理衛生學刊，3卷，2期，179-215 。 

陳伯璋(民76):教育研究的新典範一質的研究方法的發展背景及哲學期礎。現代教育，2卷，4期，23-31 。 

陳秉華、王麗斐(民79):輔導策略與輔導效果實證研究的回顧與檢討。教育心理學報，23期，237-260 。

趙   喬(民80):訓練團體之領導者和成員互動關係對團體經驗內涵之影響。輔仁大學應心所碩士論文。 

蔡茂堂、陳俊鷥、陳永成、劉偉民、陳珠璋(民70):互動過程分析於精神科門診患者團體治療之應用。中華民國神經精神醫學會會刊，7卷，2期，12-13 。

潘正德(民78):團體諮商的研究理論。輔導月刊，25卷，9、10期。

潘正德(民79):一般性團體諮商、認知模式團體諮商對五專一年級內向性適應欠佳男生的效果研究。光武工專學校，15期，443-513 。

潘正德(民81a):小團體輔導之研究理論一單一受試研究設計。學生輔導通訊，19期。 

潘正德(民81b):小團體輔導的研究理論一研究撰寫之考量。輔導月刊，28卷，11、12期。 

歐用生(民78):質的研究。台北:師大書苑。

蕭   文(民78):諮商歷程與諮商績效之研究。學生輔導通訊，12期，10-12 。

Conyne, R.K., & Rapin, L.S.(1977). A HIM-G interaction process analysis study of facilitator and self-directed groups. Small Group Behavior, 8(3), 33-340. 

Corey, G., & Corey, M.(1982). Groups:Process and practice Monterey. Ca.: Brooks/Cole. 

Hill, C.E., Charles, D., &. Reed, K.R.(1981). A Longitudinal analysis of changes in counseling skill during doctoral training in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 428-436. 

Hill, C.E., Greenwald, C., Reed, K.R., Charles, D., O'Farrell, M., 8c Carter, J. (1981). Manual for Counselor and Client Verbal Response Category Systems. Columbus, OH: Marathon Counseling and Press. 

Hill, C.E., & Gronsky, B. (1984). Research:Why and how? In J.M. Whiteley, N. Kagan, L.W. Harmon, M.F. Tanney, 8c B.R. Fretz(Eds.), The Coming Decade in Counseling Psychology. Schenectady, NY: Character Research Press. 

Hill, W. F. (1971). The Hill Interaction Matrix. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 49(8), 619-623. 

Hill, W. F.(1977). Hill Interaction Matrix(HIM). Small Group Behavior, 8(3), 251-259. 
Hill, W.F.(1977). Hill Interaction Matrix(HIM): The conceptual framework, derived rating scales, and an updated bibliography. Small Group Behavior, 8(3), 251-268. 

Download